Re: [PATCH] Doc: mention the crlf attribute in config autocrlf section
- From
- Matthew Ogilvie <mmogilvi_git@miniinfo.net>
- Date
- Nov 17, 2009, 03:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20091117035945.GA1728@comcast.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20091116195048.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com>
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 07:50:48PM +0900, Nanako Shiraishi wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Quoting Matthew Ogilvie <mmogilvi_git@miniinfo.net> > > > The reverse reference has long existed, and the autocrlf description > > was actually obsolete and wrong (saying only file content is used), > > not just incomplete. > > What do you mean by "reverse reference"? >
I'm refering to the fact that the "crlf" section of Documentation/gitattributes.txt mentions core.autocrlf, which is in the opposite (reverse) direction as this new reference I'm adding.
The crlf section has a much more thorough description of the various knobs and settings and how they interact. But I just checked, and although the gitattributes crlf section describes core.autocrlf in reasonable detail, it does not have an actual link (reference?) to git-config or the core.autocrlf section. So the commit message isn't as clear as it could be.
Do I need to resubmit the patch, in order to rephrase the commit message?
-- Matthew Ogilvie [mmogilvi_git@miniinfo.net]