Re: [PATCHv5 2/5] gitweb: Incremental blame (using JavaScript)

> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 01:39:17PM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> > Roads not taken (perhaps that should be part of commit message?):
> > * Move most (or all) of "git blame --incremental" output parsing to
> >   server side, and instead of sending direct output in text/plain,
> >   send processed data in JSON format, e.g.
> > 
> >     {"commit": {
> >        "sha1": "e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290",
> >        "info": "Kay Sievers, 2005-08-07 21:49:46 +0200",
> >        "author-initials": "KS",
> >        ...
> >      },
> >      "src-line": 13,
> >      "dst-line": 16,
> >      "numlines": 3,
> >      "filename": "README"
> >      }
> > 
> >   (line wrapping added for readibility).  This would require however
> >   taking care on Perl side to send properly formatted JSON, and on
> >   JavaScript side including json2.js code to read JSON in gitweb.js
> >   (unless we rely on eval).
> 
>   I don't know that much about web programming, what is wrong with
> relying on eval?

> > * Using some lightweight JavaScript library (framework), like jQuery,
> >   Prototype, ExtJS, MooTools, etc.  One one hand side this means not
> >   having to worry about browser incompatibilities as this would be
> >   taken care of by library; on the other hand side we want gitweb to
> >   have as few dependences as possible.
> 
>   Normally, particular version of the library is simply included within
> the project. E.g. in Girocco, I use MooTools for the tiny bit of
> javascript I do. It is probably overkill to include it just for
> incremental blame, but if we ever do much more, I think the much easier
> web programming is worth the little trouble.