Re: Add '--bisect' revision machinery argument

> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > This shows a very nice direction to evolve, but your patch as-is breaks
> > "rev-list --bisect", I think.
>
> I think you're right. I tested git rev-parse, and the 'git log'
> machinery, but I didn't think about the fact that we already had a
> meaning
> for '--bisect' in rev-list.
>
> > Also, the helper of "git bisect" can and probably should be taught to
> > just ask this new behaviour from the revision machinery, instead of
> > collecting good and bad refs itself using bisect.c::read_bisect_refs().
>
> Yeah. And git-bisect.sh can be simplified too.