Re: [RFC] pull/fetch rename

> Declaring it a failure depends on what you consider the goal of "git
> remote update" to be. I find it very useful as a shorthand for "fetch
> from _all_ remotes"[1]. Which does save typing over
>
> [...]
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:22:35AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> *1* The only thing "git remote update" does that "git fetch" does not
>> is that it can serve as "fetch from everywhere" shorthand.  But that
>> is something we could have added to "git fetch".  So in that sense, I
>> think it may make even more sense to deprecate "remote update" and
>> teach "fetch" how to do that.