Re: [RFC] pull/fetch rename
- From
Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Date
- Oct 21, 2009, 06:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20091021063008.GA3349@glandium.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LNX.2.00.0910201912390.14365@iabervon.org>
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 07:56:01PM -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Thomas Rast wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > While everyone is busy in two other UI threads, I figured I might as > > well toss up another (probably) controversial topic. > > > > Especially on IRC, we see many people who are some combination of > > misunderstanding, misusing or overusing git-pull. I figure this is > > the result of several factors, notably > > > > a) pull/push are not symmetric, > > In a certain sense they are; they both update the branches local to one > repository with the data from the other repository. In this sense, fetch > is the oddity in that it doesn't update any repository's own branches, but > just the local information about other repositories' branches.
BTW, shouldn't fetch be deprecated in favour of git remote update ? (this may require adding some features to git remote update, but you get the idea)
Mike