Re: Interim maintainer tree

From: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Date: Oct 5, 2009, 14:56 UTC
Message-ID: <20091005145615.GA9261@spearce.org>
In-Reply-To: <7viqevu1zt.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

Show 14 quoted lines

> "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
> > Junio is on vaction for the next week.  In his absence Peff and I
> > are trying to keep up with current patches in my fork:
> >
> >   git://repo.or.cz/git/spearce.git
> >   http://repo.or.cz/r/git/spearce.git
> >
> > Right now the tree matches Junio's last push, I'll try to pick up
> > the patches since then and push later today.
> 
> Thanks, both.
> 
> I've fetched, but haven't fully examined "log ..spearce/*" nor "log ..peff/*"
> yet.

Sorry, I proved to be a very poor interim maintainer this cycle.
I just didn't have the time to keep up with integration each day,
and then dropped the ball on Thursday and Friday and failed to pull
anything from Peff or the list.  Peff, thanks for keeping up a bit
and at least having some tips for Junio to pick up from.

> I noticed that some topics in 'pu' have been rebased (not complaining, but
> just making sure I am not hallucinating).

Yes, some topics in 'pu' got rebased. Wednesday I ran RB after preparing a new master, and then rebuilt pu around it. Unfortunately I somehow lost a patch on Nick's rev-list series, not sure how I managed to do that, but I guess I did, sorry.

Were you no longer in the habit of running RB when you rebuilt pu?

-- 
Shawn.