Re: Improving merge failure message
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Sep 8, 2009, 07:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090908075156.GA19294@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vk509ev20.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:48:23AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thanks, very true indeed. "It would be clobbered if we were to continue > hence we abort." is how we want to explain our behaviour, so "would" is > definitely better here.
While we're picking apart your wording, is "clobbered" the word we want to use? Everywhere else that is user-facing we tend to use the term "overwritten".
-Peff