From: Jeff King Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 07:51:56 GMT Subject: Re: Improving merge failure message Message-ID: <20090908075156.GA19294@coredump.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: <7vk509ev20.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:48:23AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Thanks, very true indeed. "It would be clobbered if we were to continue > hence we abort." is how we want to explain our behaviour, so "would" is > definitely better here. While we're picking apart your wording, is "clobbered" the word we want to use? Everywhere else that is user-facing we tend to use the term "overwritten". -Peff