Re: [BUG] 'add -u' doesn't work from untracked subdir
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Sep 5, 2009, 08:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090905080249.GA8801@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v3a717rgl.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 12:58:50AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: > > > I assume you mean "ls-files". I have every once in a while been annoyed > > by that, but given how infrequently I run ls-files, it is not a big > > deal. :) > > I did mean ls-tree, but I misspelled the name of the escape hatch.
Oh, I never noticed that behavior before. For "ls-files", I think it is at least a little sane, but it makes no sense whatsoever for ls-tree.
> At this moment (as my brain is not quite functioning), I can only say we > agreed to disagree what feels more natural here.
I agree that we agreed to disagree. But there is still one open question: would you take a patch for a "full-tree" config variable that would impact add (and probably grep) for 1.7.0? You can sleep on it if you want. ;)
-Peff