Re: [PATCH] Change mentions of "git programs" to "git commands"

From: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>
Date: Aug 11, 2009, 22:59 UTC
Message-ID: <20090812075946.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A815AAC.2030601@avtalion.name>

Quoting Ori Avtalion <ori@avtalion.name>

Show 17 quoted lines

> On 08/11/2009 06:58 AM, Nanako Shiraishi wrote:
>> From: Ori Avtalion<ori@avtalion.name>
>> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 17:24:21 +0300
>> Subject: [PATCH] Change mentions of "git programs" to "git commands"
>>
>> Most of the docs and printouts refer to "commands" when discussing what
>> the end users call via the "git" top-level program. We should refer them
>> as "git programs" when we discuss the fact that the commands are
>> implemented as separate programs, but in other contexts, it is better to
>> use the term "git commands" consistently.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ori Avtalion<ori@avtalion.name>
>> Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi<nanako3@lavabit.com>
>> ---
>>
>
> Thanks Nanako!

You're welcome, and sorry if I sounded as if I was accusing that you were wasting other's time by not re-submitting sooner. I only wanted to see a good patch go in.

Show 16 quoted lines

> You might want to consider this patch too:
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-mailsplit.txt
> b/Documentation/git-mailsplit.txt
> index 5cc94ec..8f1b99b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-mailsplit.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-mailsplit.txt
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ git-mailsplit(1)
>
>  NAME
>  ----
> -git-mailsplit - Simple UNIX mbox splitter program
> +git-mailsplit - Simple UNIX mbox splitter
>
>  SYNOPSIS
>  --------

Sorry, but I don't understand why it is necessary.

-- 
Nanako Shiraishi
http://ivory.ap.teacup.com/nanako3/