From: Nanako Shiraishi Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:59:46 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change mentions of "git programs" to "git commands" Message-ID: <20090812075946.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> In-Reply-To: <4A815AAC.2030601@avtalion.name> Quoting Ori Avtalion > On 08/11/2009 06:58 AM, Nanako Shiraishi wrote: >> From: Ori Avtalion >> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 17:24:21 +0300 >> Subject: [PATCH] Change mentions of "git programs" to "git commands" >> >> Most of the docs and printouts refer to "commands" when discussing what >> the end users call via the "git" top-level program. We should refer them >> as "git programs" when we discuss the fact that the commands are >> implemented as separate programs, but in other contexts, it is better to >> use the term "git commands" consistently. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ori Avtalion >> Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi >> --- >> > > Thanks Nanako! You're welcome, and sorry if I sounded as if I was accusing that you were wasting other's time by not re-submitting sooner. I only wanted to see a good patch go in. > You might want to consider this patch too: > > diff --git a/Documentation/git-mailsplit.txt > b/Documentation/git-mailsplit.txt > index 5cc94ec..8f1b99b 100644 > --- a/Documentation/git-mailsplit.txt > +++ b/Documentation/git-mailsplit.txt > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ git-mailsplit(1) > > NAME > ---- > -git-mailsplit - Simple UNIX mbox splitter program > +git-mailsplit - Simple UNIX mbox splitter > > SYNOPSIS > -------- Sorry, but I don't understand why it is necessary. -- Nanako Shiraishi http://ivory.ap.teacup.com/nanako3/