Re: [PATCH 5/8] Add a config option for remotes to specify a foreign vcs
- From
Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
- Date
- Aug 10, 2009, 08:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200908101032.12835.johan@herland.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LNX.2.00.0908092153520.27553@iabervon.org>
On Monday 10 August 2009, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
Show 27 quoted lines
> On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> writes: > > > If this is set, the url is not required, and the transport always > > > uses a helper named "git-remote-<value>". > > > > > > It is a separate configuration option in order to allow a sensible > > > configuration for foreign systems which either have no meaningful > > > urls for repositories or which require urls that do not specify the > > > system used by the repository at that location. However, this only > > > affects how the name of the helper is determined, not anything about > > > the interaction with the helper, and the contruction is such that, if > > > the foreign scm does happen to use a co-named url method, a url with > > > that method may be used directly. > > > > Personally, I do not like this. > > > > Why isn't it enough to define the canonical remote name git takes as > > "<name of the helper>:<whatever string the helper understands>"? > > [...] > > The only way I've been able to come up with to support this at all > usefully is to have a bunch of helper-specific options that specify what > the helper needs to know about the locations you consider to be part of > the project and an option that tells git that this remote uses the p4 > helper. I'm not sure what makes sense for other helpers, but the case I > actually use needs something like what's in this patch.
I'm somewhat agnostic on this issue. At the moment, I follow the P4 cues, and use a config like this:
[remote "foo"]
vcs = cvs
cvsRoot = ":pserver:user@cvs.server.example.com/var/cvs/cvsroot"
cvsModule = "bar"
...But I could just as well use a config like this instead:
[remote "foo"]
url = "cvs::pserver:user@cvs.server.example.com/var/cvs/cvsroot#bar"
...Either is fine with me, although I suspect users might find the current/first alternative easier to parse.
Show 14 quoted lines
> I think it makes sense for svn access to support just having a url > option like "svn://something (svn native protocol)", or > "svn+ssh://something (svn protocol over ssh)" or "svn+https://something > (https access to a svn repo)", or some other similar syntax, but this is > a poor fit for p4. > > In order to support this, there just needs to be a call to check whether > "remote-<something>" is an available git command (without running it or > giving an error), and the helper code should be used if it is. This is > actually required so that people with workstations whose domain is > .kernel.org and who have cloned "master:/home/linus/something.git" don't > start getting "remote-master isn't a git command" errors (that is, > misinterpreting ssh-format location hostnames as helper names. Johan, > perhaps you could write that for your CVS helper?
Sorry, not following you here. Write exactly what?
- The code in the transport layer for checking if "remote-<something>" is an available git command?
- The code in my CVS helper for handling the ssh-format misinterpretation, i.e. the case where someone has a git/ssh server called "cvs"? If so, how should this be handled?
Show 6 quoted lines
> I think that, ideally, helpers for foreign systems would be portable > across multiple native systems. The svn helper could be a program > "svn-remote-access-helper", and anything that speaks fast-import (e.g., > bzr or hg) would be able to use it. When installing it for git, you'd > symlink it to git-remote-svn; if you decided to install > "svn-remote-access-helper-ng", you'd change the symlink.
In that case, helpers must keep their metadata in a repo-independent format. Currently that is outside the scope of my CVS helper, since I'm leveraging git-notes for most of the CVS helper's metadata.
...Johan
-- Johan Herland, <johan@herland.net> www.herland.net