Re: [JGIT PATCH 2/2] Add support for remote.name.pushurl
Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com> wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> s?ndag 21 juni 2009 03:21:56 skrev "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>:
> > diff --git a/org.spearce.jgit.pgm/src/org/spearce/jgit/pgm/Push.java b/org.spearce.jgit.pgm/src/org/spearce/jgit/pgm/Push.java
> > index 19d31a1..9364e4a 100644
> > --- a/org.spearce.jgit.pgm/src/org/spearce/jgit/pgm/Push.java
> > +++ b/org.spearce.jgit.pgm/src/org/spearce/jgit/pgm/Push.java
> > @@ -102,7 +102,8 @@ protected void run() throws Exception {
> > refSpecs.add(spec.setForceUpdate(true));
> > }
> >
> > - final List<Transport> transports = Transport.openAll(db, remote);
> > + final List<Transport> transports;
> > + transports = Transport.openAll(db, remote, Transport.Operation.PUSH);
>
> Nit-pick. We usually initialize in one statement. I'll squash that for you.Actually I did that because otherwise we'd run over 80 columns on
that line. If you let Eclipse format the code for you, it line
wraps onto a 2nd line anyway. In such cases I personally just find
this format more readable. But whatever.
--
Shawn.
Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>