From: Shawn O. Pearce Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:50:16 GMT Subject: Re: [JGIT PATCH 2/2] Add support for remote.name.pushurl Message-ID: <20090623165016.GD11191@spearce.org> In-Reply-To: <200906211930.43809.robin.rosenberg@dewire.com> Robin Rosenberg wrote: > s?ndag 21 juni 2009 03:21:56 skrev "Shawn O. Pearce" : > > diff --git a/org.spearce.jgit.pgm/src/org/spearce/jgit/pgm/Push.java b/org.spearce.jgit.pgm/src/org/spearce/jgit/pgm/Push.java > > index 19d31a1..9364e4a 100644 > > --- a/org.spearce.jgit.pgm/src/org/spearce/jgit/pgm/Push.java > > +++ b/org.spearce.jgit.pgm/src/org/spearce/jgit/pgm/Push.java > > @@ -102,7 +102,8 @@ protected void run() throws Exception { > > refSpecs.add(spec.setForceUpdate(true)); > > } > > > > - final List transports = Transport.openAll(db, remote); > > + final List transports; > > + transports = Transport.openAll(db, remote, Transport.Operation.PUSH); > > Nit-pick. We usually initialize in one statement. I'll squash that for you. Actually I did that because otherwise we'd run over 80 columns on that line. If you let Eclipse format the code for you, it line wraps onto a 2nd line anyway. In such cases I personally just find this format more readable. But whatever. -- Shawn.