Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] Teach Solaris that _XOPEN_SOURCE=600 really menas XPG6
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- May 28, 2009, 19:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090528195057.GA14360@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <kZP6fFCtTQSG03irLxGArpacn-5pYEauMj-b0VWwhzPWMGiC_XnsYw@cipher.nrlssc.navy.mil>
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 02:40:14PM -0500, Brandon Casey wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> It's not the compiler that prevents compilation. It's the header files. > > You mentioned that on Solaris 8 there was only a single declaration for > iconv. There was not a macro check for _XPG6. I suspect that Solaris 8 > does not support XPG6, so your compilation is just falling back to XPG4.
OK, that makes sense.
> The same thing happens on Solaris 7. On Solaris 10, if the macros are > set such that _XPG6 becomes set, then compilation will fail if the > compiler is not a c99 one.
Right. What I was trying to say is "gcc 3.1.1 is probably c99 enough, and I am using it already". That is, if you were asking how painful it would be to require a c99 compiler for Solaris git, I am saying I don't personally care.
But I don't know what is "normal".
-Peff