Re: [PATCH 0/5] RESEND: git notes
- From
Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
- Date
- May 16, 2009, 11:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200905161320.45426.johan@herland.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vpre9plwl.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Saturday 16 May 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> writes: > > In sum, these 5 patches produce the exact same result as the original > > js/notes series (plus my 2 patches). > > Thanks, but you did no such thing, actually. > > The result from this sequence > > git checkout -b jh/notes v1.6.3.1^0 > git am ./+jh-notes.mbox ;# these patches > git checkout v1.6.3.1^0 > git merge js/notes ;# allow rerere to reapply the resolution > git diff -R jh/notes^ > > should be empty, or should show your improvements over what has been > queued in 'pu'.
Sorry for the screwup. The diff should in any case not be empty, since the first patch (the cleanup/bugfix part) of my original 2 patches (which are NOT in js/notes on 'pu') has been squashed into the first 4 patches of this new series.
Therefore, the diff you quote below is simply this first patch from my original two-part series (the second patch of that series is now the 5th patch in this series - adding '-m' and '-F' support to 'git notes edit').
Show 17 quoted lines
> Here is what I see: > > diff --git b/git-notes.sh a/git-notes.sh > index 6ec33c9..7c3b8b9 100755 > --- b/git-notes.sh > +++ a/git-notes.sh > @@ -20,15 +20,16 @@ edit) > die "Refusing to edit notes in $GIT_NOTES_REF (outside of refs/notes/)" fi > > - MESSAGE="$GIT_DIR"/new-notes-$COMMIT > + MSG_FILE="$GIT_DIR/new-notes-$COMMIT" > + GIT_INDEX_FILE="MSG_FILE.idx" > > Renaming of the variable MESSAGE to MSG_FILE may be an improvement, as > the former could have puzzled the reader if $MESSAGE contains the message > itself, or it has the name of a file that stores the message (the answer > is latter).
Indeed. If you look at the next patch (adding support for '-m' and '-F'), you will see that I reuse $MESSAGE to hold the _actual_ message (given by '-m' or '-F').
> But I think there is a regression with a missing '$' here.
Yes. Thanks for catching.
Show 20 quoted lines
> + export GIT_INDEX_FILE > + > trap ' > - test -f "$MESSAGE" && rm "$MESSAGE" > + test -f "$MSG_FILE" && rm "$MSG_FILE" > + test -f "$GIT_INDEX_FILE" && rm "$GIT_INDEX_FILE" > ' 0 > > Another improvement is that the variable definitions were moved up before > the trap that uses these definitions. This is a good change. > > - GIT_NOTES_REF= git log -1 $COMMIT | sed "s/^/#/" > "$MESSAGE" > - > - GIT_INDEX_FILE="$MESSAGE".idx > - export GIT_INDEX_FILE > + git log -1 $COMMIT | sed "s/^/#/" > "$MSG_FILE" > > Dscho's version exports an empty GIT_NOTES_REF, presumably to avoid > triggering the notes mechanism, while running this "git log -1", but > yours don't. Is there a reason behind this change?
Oh, so _that's_ what he did... I was puzzled by that "stray" 'GIT_NOTES_REF= '...
Yet another screwup on my part.
Show 28 quoted lines
> The rest are fallouts from s/MESSAGE/MSG_FILE/ renaming.
>
> @@ -36,16 +37,16 @@ edit)
> else
> PARENT="-p $CURRENT_HEAD"
> git read-tree "$GIT_NOTES_REF" || die "Could not read index"
> - git cat-file blob :$COMMIT >> "$MESSAGE" 2> /dev/null
> + git cat-file blob :$COMMIT >> "$MSG_FILE" 2> /dev/null
> fi
>
> core_editor="$(git config core.editor)"
> - ${GIT_EDITOR:-${core_editor:-${VISUAL:-${EDITOR:-vi}}}} "$MESSAGE"
> + ${GIT_EDITOR:-${core_editor:-${VISUAL:-${EDITOR:-vi}}}} "$MSG_FILE"
>
> - grep -v ^# < "$MESSAGE" | git stripspace > "$MESSAGE".processed
> - mv "$MESSAGE".processed "$MESSAGE"
> - if [ -s "$MESSAGE" ]; then
> - BLOB=$(git hash-object -w "$MESSAGE") ||
> + grep -v ^# < "$MSG_FILE" | git stripspace > "$MSG_FILE".processed
> + mv "$MSG_FILE".processed "$MSG_FILE"
> + if [ -s "$MSG_FILE" ]; then
> + BLOB=$(git hash-object -w "$MSG_FILE") ||
> die "Could not write into object database"
> git update-index --add --cacheinfo 0644 $BLOB $COMMIT ||
> die "Could not write index"
>
> I am a bit reluctant to take this to replace js/notes as-is until I hear
> answers to these points (and others may have comments too).Thanks for the review. I will send an updated series with the above fixes.
...Johan
-- Johan Herland, <johan@herland.net> www.herland.net