Re: [PATCH 0/3] log: prettier decorations
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- May 13, 2009, 21:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090513212812.GA21268@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <1242249726-8514-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:22:03AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> In order to do that I had to change prettify_ref to prettify_refname because > add_ref_decoration doesn't have the ref object.
Thanks, this 1/3 looks fine to me.
But:
> Felipe Contreras (3): > Change prettify_ref to prettify_refname > Prettify log decorations even more > Fix test for new log decorate
Shouldn't 2/3 and 3/3 just be squashed together? It looks like 3/3 fixes tests broken in 2/3, so you are hurting bisectability if they don't happen together.
Other than that, I think the intent of the change and the implementation look fine.
-Peff