Re: [PATCH] bisect: remove Perl use by implementing "git bisect--helper --sq-quote"
- From
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
- Date
- Apr 23, 2009, 19:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200904232120.01300.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7veivl444b.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Le mercredi 22 avril 2009, Junio C Hamano a écrit :
Show 8 quoted lines
> Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> writes: > > The sq() function in "git-bisect.sh" was the only place where Perl > > was needed. This patch remove this use of Perl by implementing > > a new "--sq-quote" option in "builtin-bisect--helper.c". > > Isn't it because only git-bisect.sh for whatever reason reimplements sq > using Perl while original implementation in am used sed for more > portability?
Well I saw that there was some work going to remove perl dependencies, so I thought that I might help by removing the Perl dependency from git-bisect.sh.
I didn't look at other places where sq is implemented otherwise. I just checked other shell scripts where there is @@PERL@@.
Show 6 quoted lines
> I would suspect, if it were 3 years ago, that any serious porcelain > writers would have very much appreciated such a feature that gives shell > programmers an easy access to a quoting function that allows a safe eval, > and I would have strongly suggested that the feature to be implemented in > a more permanent place rather than in bisect--helper; perhaps a better > place would be the kitchen-sink "rev-parse".
I did it in bisect--helper because I was working on it, and I wanted to do it in C because I am porting bisect stuff to C.
But now that you pointed that sq is also implemented in git-am.sh, I agree that it would be perhaps better if it was implemented in something like "rev-parse". And then it could be used both in "git-bisect.sh" and in "git-am.sh".
> But given that nobody seems competent enough to do serious programming in > shell these days, I am not sure if the choice between bisect--helper and > rev-parse makes much of a difference ;-).
We never know, it might become trendy again ;-)
Best regards, Christian.