Re: [RFC/WIP 0/2] Documentation clean-up: git commands
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Mar 24, 2009, 03:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090324033410.GB12829@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <37FD43AD-E43A-4565-8085-95E606E0B868@pobox.com>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 06:13:11PM -0500, Chris Johnsen wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> I have a series of patches prepared to "cleanup" and modify
> {callout,manpage-1.72}.xsl and asciidoc.conf, but I am still running a
> series of "make doc" runs across the changes to try to make sure they are
> sane. Here is a preview:
>
> Documentation: move callouts.xsl to manpage-{base,normal}.xsl
> Documentation: use parametrized manpage-base.xsl with manpage-
> {1.72,normal}.xsl
> Documentation: rename docbook-xsl-172 attribute to git-asciidoc-no-roff
> Documentation: move quieting params into manpage-base.xsl
> Documentation: move "spurious .sp" code into manpage-base.xsl
> Documentation: asciidoc.conf: always use <literallayout> for [blocktext]
> Documentation: asciidoc.conf: fix verse block with block titles
> Documentation: option to render literal text as italic for manpagesOh, good, thanks for working on this. I was actually about to start looking at it tonight.
For the final one, italicized or emphasized text will often end up underlined in most terminals. Peeking at other manpages led me to the conclusion that bolding literal text is the most common convention.
-Peff