Re: Subject: [PATCH] Push to create
- From
Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Mar 3, 2009, 18:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090303184106.GH14365@spearce.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090303092301.GE32284@mit.edu>
Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 12:30:46AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: > > > > > But I think that coincides with what I was trying to say in my original > > > response to the series, which is "this issue is complex, and we need to > > > hear from the people who would really want this exactly what it is they > > > want". > > > > And we haven't heard from them at all, unless you and/or Shawn are > > interested. After all we may not have to worry about this at all ;-) > > Junio, I assume you saw Scott James Remnant blog posts, "Git Sucks"? > > http://www.netsplit.com/2009/02/17/git-sucks/
Funny, this very blog post is talking about why I think remote creation should be under git push, not "git init --remote".
IMHO, maybe we also should change the error message that receive-pack produces when the path its given isn't a Git repository. Its really not very human friendly to say "unable to chdir or not a git archive". Hell, we don't even call them archives, we call them repositories.
-- Shawn.