Re: [PATCH] builtin-branch: highlight current remote branches with an asterisk
- From
Björn Steinbrink <b.steinbrink@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 10, 2009, 12:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090210122341.GH1320@atjola.homenet>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090210115943.GA15387@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On 2009.02.10 06:59:43 -0500, Jeff King wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:50:36PM +0100, Björn Steinbrink wrote: > > Yeah, as I said in the other mail, having it as a default would make add > > -m quite pointless. > > Not necessarily. You might be interested in some other branch that isn't > their HEAD. So yes, you would hopefully be using it much less because we > would be guessing what you wanted to put there instead of making you > type it. But it would still be useful as an override.
I guess you read that in the wrong context (or I replied in the wrong context). What I meant is that it would be bad if "git remote update" or "git fetch <remote>" or whatever would update <remote>/HEAD automatically, as that would kill what you have setup with -m.
Using -m as an override for the automatic guessing makes sense, sure. It's even what the docs say how it's supposed to work already (it just doesn't create <remote>/HEAD at all atm, unless -m is given).
Björn