Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/3] fix "Funny: git -p submodule summary"
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jan 28, 2009, 07:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090128073059.GD19165@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0901271728130.3586@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 05:31:02PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> I like the patch series, well designed and concise (especially with the > fixes Hannes proposed).
Good. Response seems positive, so I will drop the RFC, then, and post a fixed-up series meant for inclusion.
Show 10 quoted lines
> > There are two potential downsides to the fix: > > > > 1. There is an extra fork and a parent process sitting in memory for > > dashed externals. This is pretty necessary to any fix, since > > something has to wait to do pager cleanup, and we can't rely on the > > child to do so. > > Actually, I think this is a good thing; that way, we can catch > segmentation fault properly and display an error message in the pager. > That was not possible previously.
True. On the other hand, most of our externals are shell scripts. It's the builtins that segfault, and we don't have a watcher process for that. :)
-Peff