Re: Funny: git -p submodule summary
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jan 9, 2009, 09:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090109093307.GA2039@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7veizc25e8.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 01:30:23AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> This arrangement to have the third process could even open the possibility > of having it read from git and write to pager, and not launching the pager > if there is no interesting data from git to feed it with. > > I do not know if I like the performance implications associated with it, > though.
Ugh. That has definitely been a requested feature, but the thought of essentially running "cat" in our pipeline strikes me as a bit kludgey.
On the other hand, we are by definition going to the pager in that case, so in theory performance is less of a consideration.
But see my other mail for why a third process is hard to always do on Windows.
-Peff