Re: [PATCH 3/3] implement pattern matching in ce_path_match
- From
Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
- Date
- Jan 15, 2009, 08:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090115082017.GA7801@localhost>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vvdshzfpk.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 02:27:03PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> In places we read paths from the index or from the work tree and add them > as pathspec elements---you would want to mark them as non-globbing, too. > Which probably means that "is it Ok to glob this" setting has to be per > pathspec array elements.
Right. This certainly complicates things. Also note that this invalidates 1/3, because even if '?' matched exactly, it can still match '*', and vice versa. Depending on ordering one of these two cases would pose a problem.