Re: [PATCH next] git-cherry usage: correct nesting of commit-ish options
- From
Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web.de>
- Date
- Jan 4, 2009, 16:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200901041716.00673.markus.heidelberg@web.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <200901041711.23026.markus.heidelberg@web.de>
Markus Heidelberg, 04.01.2009:
Show 8 quoted lines
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web.de> > --- > > What is the preferred way to say the patch is against next? In the > subject like this? > Another question: should this patch be split up into two, one for > maint/master and another for next?
For the second patch against next I meant it being based on origin/next that already includes the extracted patch for maint/master.