From: Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web.de>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:16:00 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] git-cherry usage: correct nesting of commit-ish options
Message-ID: <200901041716.00673.markus.heidelberg@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <200901041711.23026.markus.heidelberg@web.de>

Markus Heidelberg, 04.01.2009:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web.de>
> ---
> 
> What is the preferred way to say the patch is against next? In the
> subject like this?
> Another question: should this patch be split up into two, one for
> maint/master and another for next?

For the second patch against next I meant it being based on origin/next
that already includes the extracted patch for maint/master.