Re: RFC: Change whatchanged to report changes from merges by default?
- From
- Mark Burton <markb@ordern.com>
- Date
- Dec 20, 2008, 20:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20081220202109.336d0a5e@crow>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vvdtewqvy.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:09:05 -0800 Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> IOW, I consider "whatchanged" a command that is kept only for old timers' > sake. There is no reason to promote it, but there is no reason to > deprecate it, either. Which means the answer to this question... > > > Would it not make more sense to have git whatchanged show the changes > > introduced by merges by default and then people can use the (already > > supported) --no-merges option to suppress that behaviour? > > ... is a NO spelled in capital letters.
OK (spelled in capital letters), I won't submit the patch.
Cheers,
Mark