From: Mark Burton <markb@ordern.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:21:09 GMT
Subject: Re: RFC: Change whatchanged to report changes from merges by default?
Message-ID: <20081220202109.336d0a5e@crow>
In-Reply-To: <7vvdtewqvy.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>


On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:09:05 -0800
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

> IOW, I consider "whatchanged" a command that is kept only for old timers'
> sake.  There is no reason to promote it, but there is no reason to
> deprecate it, either.  Which means the answer to this question...
> 
> > Would it not make more sense to have git whatchanged show the changes
> > introduced by merges by default and then people can use the (already
> > supported) --no-merges option to suppress that behaviour?  
> 
> ... is a NO spelled in capital letters.

OK (spelled in capital letters), I won't submit the patch.

Cheers,

Mark