Re: Fwd: git status options feature suggestion

From: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Date: Oct 12, 2008, 18:05 UTC
Message-ID: <20081012180504.GD4856@spearce.org>
In-Reply-To: <20081012064512.GA32597@coredump.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:

Show 15 quoted lines

> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:41:18PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> > And just make it mimic whatever folks accustomed to "svn st" would expect,
> > modulo we would need two status letters to signal difference between
> > (HEAD, index), and (index, worktree).  Perhaps three if you want to show
> > difference between (HEAD, worktree) while at it.
> 
> I remember a long time ago you started on a parallel diff walker that
> could diff the working tree, the index, and a tree at once. Do you
> remember the issues with it?
> 
> I think that would be the right tool here to show each file only once,
> but with multiple status flags. Something like:
> 
>   A M foo

I have a tool that I'll be open-sourcing later this year, but it does something like that:

  project foo/                        branch master
   Am   foo
   M-   bar
   R-   orig => dest ( 95%)

Line coloring is red on lines with unstaged stuff in the working directory (3rd column, lower case letters) and green on lines that are fully staged (3rd column is a '-').

The tool is in Python, but I'm just scraping the output of `diff-index -M --cached HEAD` and diff-files to get that display. The status letters are exactly those given out by diff-index/diff-files, but the diff-files output is lowercased.

Scott Chacon has seen the tool output and likes it; there's a tech talk that will be posted on YouTube soon where he and I are sort of talking about it.

Sorry I can't say too much more about it yet. But I'm trying to say that both Scott and I like a denser display like this.

-- 
Shawn.