Re: Merge seems to get confused by (reverted) cherry-picks

From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
Date: Sep 3, 2008, 17:10 UTC
Message-ID: <20080903171028.GA1657@glandium.org>
In-Reply-To: <200809031316.05336.johan@herland.net>

On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 01:16:05PM +0200, Johan Herland wrote:

Show 13 quoted lines

> On Wednesday 03 September 2008, Ittay Dror wrote:
> > Note: codeville tried to implement a merge algorithm that considers
> > the history to decide what the user wants to do:
> > http://revctrl.org/PreciseCodevilleMerge. Maybe worth while
> > exploring?
> 
> You haven't been here long, have you? ;)
> 
> There was an infamous mailing list discussion between Bram Cohen (who 
> created PreciseCodevilleMerge), and Linus Torvalds back in 2005, 
> discussing merge strategies. It is well recounted here:
> 
> http://wincent.com/a/about/wincent/weblog/archives/2007/07/a_look_back_bra.php

I quite agree with the footnote statement, except on one thing: it would make it easier to have additional tools to help with such merge resolutions automatically.

While resolving a rename/delete merge conflict is not a big deal, resolving function moves from one file to another (possibly new) file is another story.

Mike