git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Merge seems to get confused by (reverted) cherry-picks

From
Björn Steinbrink <b.steinbrink@gmx.de>
Date
Sep 3, 2008, 07:20 UTC
Message-ID
<20080903072011.GA14252@atjola.homenet>
Hi,

"git merge" produces a (IMHO) wrong result, when a commit from the branch that is to be merged in was cherry-picked into the current branch and later reverted on the original branch. Basically ignoring the revert.

Example: mkdir gmt cd gmt git init

/bin/echo -e "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n" > file git add file git commit -m init

/bin/echo -e "1\n2\n3\na\n4\n5\n6\n" > file git add file git commit -m add

git revert --no-edit HEAD

git checkout -b test HEAD~2 sleep 1 # Avoid race git cherry-pick master^ git merge master

That last "git merge" call happily tells: Already uptodate! Merge made by recursive.

And "file" still contains the "a" that was added in the second commit.

Seems broken to me, of course I want that revert to "show up" in the merge result, probably as a conflict for me to resolve.

Björn
Next: Björn Steinbrink
Message 1 of 9 in “Merge seems to get confused by (reverted) cherry-picks”
  1. Björn SteinbrinkSep 3, 2008
  2. Björn SteinbrinkSep 3, 2008
  3. Junio C HamanoSep 3, 2008
  4. Björn SteinbrinkSep 3, 2008
  5. Linus TorvaldsSep 3, 2008
  6. Ittay DrorSep 3, 2008
  7. Andreas EricssonSep 3, 2008
  8. Johan HerlandSep 3, 2008
  9. Mike HommeySep 3, 2008

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.