Re: pack count on repo.or.cz [was "Medium term dreams"]
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Sep 3, 2008, 10:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080903100828.GS10360@machine.or.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <48BD446C.6020403@viscovery.net>
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 03:49:32PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Petr Baudis schrieb: > >> As to why the other packs weren't pruned, I don't know. In my example, > >> you can see that the pruning happens as we expect. So either there is a > >> bug in git-prune-packed, or there is something we're not realizing. > > > > Well, that's my question here. :-) > > Does removing all the *.keep files help? ;)
Haha, good catch - thanks! :-) I wonder where they came from, though I hazily remember some curious behaviour of older Git versions wrt. .keep files and they seem all to be of old date. Now I have a single nice pack and fsck of all the forks still passes fine.
Thanks all, I will adopt this for all projects.
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis The next generation of interesting software will be done on the Macintosh, not the IBM PC. -- Bill Gates