Re: pack count on repo.or.cz [was "Medium term dreams"]
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Sep 2, 2008, 13:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080902130801.GN10360@machine.or.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080902115424.GA11303@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 07:54:24AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> So did you check for loose objects? That is what you should get if there > were any objects that would have been lost. If there aren't any new > loose objects, then there were no objects that would be lost.
Before:
rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects~/??/* | wc -l 3343 rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects~/pack/* | wc -l 750
After:
rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects/??/* | wc -l 2920 rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects/pack/* | wc -l 590
> As to why the other packs weren't pruned, I don't know. In my example, > you can see that the pruning happens as we expect. So either there is a > bug in git-prune-packed, or there is something we're not realizing.
Well, that's my question here. :-)
If you're still interested in looking into this further, you can wget -r or rsync over the git.git repository from repo.or.cz.
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis The next generation of interesting software will be done on the Macintosh, not the IBM PC. -- Bill Gates