Re: [PATCH] be paranoid about closed stdin/stdout/stderr
- From
Stephen R. van den Berg <srb@cuci.nl>
- Date
- Aug 28, 2008, 12:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080828125258.GA16940@cuci.nl>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080828122142.GA6518@mail.local.tull.net>
Nick Andrew wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 02:22:39PM -0400, Avery Pennarun wrote: >> I'm just feeling protective of the future sanity of other developers >> here, hoping they don't have to go through what I did on a multi-week
>You're not alone. I've been having trouble with a combination of >fetchmail, procmail and ssmtp, in which situation the ssmtp program >_somehow_ sometimes opens /dev/urandom as file descriptor 0 (while
>in controlled circumstances. It's possible that fetchmail or procmail >is doing something stupid - but a little more defensive programming >in ssmtp could avoid the total disaster area of sending an endless >binary stream to an SMTP server.
Procmail I can vouch for, it basically assumes your OS is broken and fights it's way back to sanity (it can be setuid root, so it has to be rather careful). Nonetheless, I still maintain that hiding problems doesn't help, it only makes the bugs even rarer and more difficult to find.
The filedescriptor problem is a programmer-error, not a user-error, which is why not hiding it should be preferred. If it were a user-error, thing would be different, assisting the user is a Good Thing.
--
Sincerely,
Stephen R. van den Berg.
"Listen carefully, I shall say this only wence."