Re: [RFH] filter-branch: ancestor detection weirdness
- From
Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
- Date
- Aug 9, 2008, 09:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200808091135.28249.trast@student.ethz.ch>
- In-Reply-To
- <200808091125.48897.trast@student.ethz.ch>
Thomas Rast wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > Perhaps --full-history is needed to the rev-list call (and the recent > > But --full-history cannot solve this problem; it would entirely defeat > the point of --subdirectory-filter. (I haven't looked into what > --simplify-merges does yet.)
Actually, on this point I stand corrected, in some tests it has a good effect. I'll look into it.
- Thomas
-- Thomas Rast trast@student.ethz.ch