Re: rev-parse doesn't take pwd into consideration
Quoting Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>:
Show 5 quoted lines
> But I do not think I (or we collectively as the project) can afford to
> keep doing that in the longer term. A minute lost for me is a minute lost
> for the project to review and integrate changes that others spent dozens
> of minutes, perhaps hours, to come up with. So I should not be constantly
> doing the archive research for other people.
I agree that your time is more valuable.
Show 10 quoted lines
> My response might have been mean, and I instead could have ignored it and
> allow the thread to waste time of others responding to it, but that would
> have been a worse alternative than nipping it off in the bud. I am not
> sure what better alternatives there were, other than having a dedicated
> secretary/librarian to do the archive research for the community.
>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/68786/focus=68852
>
> Yeah, that's the one I had in mind. I like quoting the threaded interface
> from gmane --- it makes the context of old discussion very clear.
I remembered that you were not so happy when I pointed at marc.info the last time. I can learn (^_^).
And it was very easy to find the discussion in gmane (I asked "relative cwd path blob" and the discussion was the first in the list).
> Thanks.
--
Nanako Shiraishi
http://ivory.ap.teacup.com/nanako3/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Free pop3 email with a spam filter.
http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/5
しらいしななこ <nanako3@bluebottle.com>