From: しらいしななこ Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 10:53:27 GMT Subject: Re: rev-parse doesn't take pwd into consideration Message-ID: <200805271054.m4RAs3NE004265@mi0.bluebottle.com> In-Reply-To: <7vprr84tzc.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Quoting Junio C Hamano : > But I do not think I (or we collectively as the project) can afford to > keep doing that in the longer term. A minute lost for me is a minute lost > for the project to review and integrate changes that others spent dozens > of minutes, perhaps hours, to come up with. So I should not be constantly > doing the archive research for other people. I agree that your time is more valuable. > My response might have been mean, and I instead could have ignored it and > allow the thread to waste time of others responding to it, but that would > have been a worse alternative than nipping it off in the bud. I am not > sure what better alternatives there were, other than having a dedicated > secretary/librarian to do the archive research for the community. > >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/68786/focus=68852 > > Yeah, that's the one I had in mind. I like quoting the threaded interface > from gmane --- it makes the context of old discussion very clear. I remembered that you were not so happy when I pointed at marc.info the last time. I can learn (^_^). And it was very easy to find the discussion in gmane (I asked "relative cwd path blob" and the discussion was the first in the list). > Thanks. You are wellcome (^_^). -- Nanako Shiraishi http://ivory.ap.teacup.com/nanako3/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Free pop3 email with a spam filter. http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/5