Re: Minor bug in 'stg edit' ?

From: Paul Donohue <stgit-bug@topquark.net>
Date: Feb 28, 2008, 21:54 UTC
Message-ID: <20080228215415.GO2222@TopQuark.net>
In-Reply-To: <b0943d9e0802281343l7c3190a1va564a87afce1ea06@mail.gmail.com>

The only problem it causes is that it shows up as an untracked file if you run 'git status'

I guess this doesn't really matter since you should be using 'stg status' instead, but 'git status' supports colors, so I generally use that instead of 'stg status', since I can interpret the colored output slightly faster than I can scan for ? flags when I want to know if I need to 'stg add' any files before I 'stg refresh'...

Thanks. -Paul

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 09:43:53PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:

Show 14 quoted lines

> On 27/02/2008, Paul Donohue <stgit-bug@topquark.net> wrote:
> > I'm running StGIT 0.14.1
> >
> >  After running 'stg edit', the file '.stgit-edit.txt' is always left behind.
> >
> >  Is this supposed to happen?  I would have assumed the file would be automatically removed after the changes were committed.
> 
> I wouldn't say it's a bug as I never thought it would cause any
> problems if left. Anyway, we could remove it if the operation was
> successful.
> 
> -- 
> Catalin
>