Re: Is there a reason to keep walker.c ?

From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
Date: Jan 27, 2008, 20:51 UTC
Message-ID: <20080127205155.GA5476@glandium.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.1.00.0801272045490.23907@racer.site>

On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 08:46:59PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

Show 15 quoted lines

> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Mike Hommey wrote:
> 
> > While working on the http code refactoring, I got to wonder if the 
> > walker.c "wrapper", that is only used for the http transport, is still 
> > worth keeping. If there are plans for others transport to use this code, 
> > obviously, it would be worth keeping, but on the contrary, I think it 
> > would simplify the http transport code even more. What do you think ?
> 
> Really, I was waiting for somebody needing ftp and/or sftp support badly 
> enough, so let's keep it.
> 
> I mean, one of those guys asking for ftp push support _got_ to just start 
> scratching that itch, right?

Though, technically, ftp push could work with the curl code.

Mike