Re: git-svn branch naming question
- From
Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
- Date
- Dec 9, 2007, 02:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20071209023600.GP3199@genesis.frugalware.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20071209022624.GA31033@soma>
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 06:26:24PM -0800, Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
> I'm not sure if it's considered a "bug", but that's just the > way it is at the moment. I can't remember why, but I did > make git-svn force the presence of the "remotes/" prefix > in all refs it writes to...
okay, i see. one problem: git-svnimport is to be removed and (afaik) the supposed way is to use git-svn instead. what is the supposed way to use git-svn to convert an svn repo to a git one if the method i tried is not working?
(if the branches are fetched to "remotes/" then they won't be visible when one clones the converted repo)
thanks, - VMiklos