From: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 02:36:00 GMT
Subject: Re: git-svn branch naming question
Message-ID: <20071209023600.GP3199@genesis.frugalware.org>
In-Reply-To: <20071209022624.GA31033@soma>

On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 06:26:24PM -0800, Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
> I'm not sure if it's considered a "bug", but that's just the
> way it is at the moment.  I can't remember why, but I did
> make git-svn force the presence of the "remotes/" prefix
> in all refs it writes to...

okay, i see. one problem: git-svnimport is to be removed and (afaik) the
supposed way is to use git-svn instead. what is the supposed way to use
git-svn to convert an svn repo to a git one if the method i tried is not
working?

(if the branches are fetched to "remotes/" then they won't be visible
when one clones the converted repo)

thanks,
- VMiklos