Re: git guidance

From: Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>
Date: Dec 7, 2007, 10:53 UTC
Message-ID: <200712071353.11654.a1426z@gawab.com>
In-Reply-To: <475906F7.5010309@op5.se>

Andreas Ericsson wrote:

Show 23 quoted lines

> So, to get to the bottom of this, which of the following workflows is it
> you want git to support?
>
> ### WORKFLOW A ###
> edit, edit, edit
> edit, edit, edit
> edit, edit, edit
> Oops I made a mistake and need to hop back to "current - 12".
> edit, edit, edit
> edit, edit, edit
> publish everything, similar to just tarring up your workdir and sending
> out ### END WORKFLOW A ###
>
> ### WORKFLOW B ###
> edit, edit, edit
> ok this looks good, I want to save a checkpoint here
> edit, edit, edit
> looks good again. next checkpoint
> edit, edit, edit
> oh crap, back to checkpoint 2
> edit, edit, edit
> ooh, that's better. save a checkpoint and publish those checkpoints
> ### END WORKFLOW B ###

### WORKFLOW C ### for every save on a gitfs mounted dir, do an implied checkpoint, commit, or publish (should be adjustable), on its privately created on-the-fly repository. ### END WORKFLOW C ###

For example:

  echo "// last comment on this file" >> /gitfs.mounted/file

should do an implied checkpoint, and make these checkpoints immediately visible under some checkpoint branch of the gitfs mounted dir.

Note, this way the developer gets version control without even noticing, and works completely transparent to any kind of application.

Thanks!

-- Al