git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH] Make builtin-tag.c use parse_options.

From
Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Date
Nov 12, 2007, 14:52 UTC
Message-ID
<20071112145252.GA343@artemis.corp>
In-Reply-To
<1b46aba20711120509l104792ebo4ea9a51c710510f3@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:09:37PM +0000, Carlos Rica wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> 2007/11/10, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>:
> > Carlos Rica <jasampler@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > > Also, this removes those tests ensuring that repeated
> > > -m options don't allocate memory more than once, because now
> > > this is done after parsing options, using the last one
> > > when more are given. The same for -F.
> >
> > The reason for this change is...?  Is this because it is
> > cumbersome to detect and refuse multiple -m options using the
> > parseopt API?  If so, the API may be what needs to be fixed.
> > Taking the last one and discarding earlier ones feels to me an
> > arbitrary choice.
> 
> You can do many things with repeated options.
> Here in git-tag we considered two different ways to manage them:
> Concatenating values for the option and/or refusing more than one.
> I found that current option-parser can do both from the client
> using callbacks, as Pierre shows me, so I think it is the right way to do it.
> 
> Pierre, by default, I think that the parser should print an error
> when more than one option of the same type is given,
  I beg to differ. It makes sense for OPTION_STRING options, but not for
other. Though you cannot always detect that.
Also note that:
(1) repeating options was already silent in many git commands, so it's
    not really a regression ;
(2) for many commands it actually make sense to allow repeating (for
    _BOOLEAN e.g.). And I'd argue that for OPTION_BIT it also makes
    sense as well.
Show 9 quoted lines
> in order to report it to the command-line user, but make this
> behaviour optional for the programmer.  Specifically, I thought in
> this last option:
> 
> enum parse_opt_option_flags {
> 	PARSE_OPT_OPTARG   = 1,
> 	PARSE_OPT_NOARG    = 2,
> 	PARSE_OPT_ALLOWREP = 4
> };
  To do that you need to keep a list of the triggered commands to do
that, there is no way to achieve that reliably right now. As taking the
last one and discarding the other is the usual way for option parsers I
never saw this as a big issue.
-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org
Previous: Carlos RicaNext: Kristian Høgsberg
Message 10 of 11 in “Make builtin-tag.c use parse_options.”
  1. Make builtin-tag.c use parse_options.Carlos Rica, Nov 9, 2007
  2. Jakub NarebskiNov 9, 2007
  3. Johannes SchindelinNov 9, 2007
  4. Junio C HamanoNov 10, 2007
  5. Junio C HamanoNov 10, 2007
  6. Junio C HamanoNov 10, 2007
  7. Carlos RicaNov 10, 2007
  8. Pierre HabouzitNov 10, 2007
  9. Carlos RicaNov 12, 2007
  10. Pierre HabouzitNov 12, 2007
  11. Kristian HøgsbergNov 12, 2007

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.