Re: unmerging feature branches
- From
- martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>
- Date
- Oct 31, 2007, 21:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20071031212730.GA32170@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20071031211658.GA5430@inspiron>
also sprach Alejandro Martinez Ruiz <alex@flawedcode.org> [2007.10.31.2216 +0100]:
> So how about an "undo" command or a switch for revert with a special > meaning like "hey, this one is a nice commit, but it ain't ready yet, > I'd like you to ignore I ever committed the thing when merging or > rebasing again, thanks"?
Revert does exactly that, by reverting the content. That's all Git cares about. Does
http://lists-archives.org/git/634475-unmerging-feature-branches.html
make it clear?
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
"getting a scsi chain working is perfectly simple if you remember that
there must be exactly three terminations: one on one end of the
cable, one on the far end, and the goat, terminated over the scsi
chain with a silver-handled knife whilst burning *black* candles."
-- anthony deboer
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net