From: martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:27:30 GMT
Subject: Re: unmerging feature branches
Message-ID: <20071031212730.GA32170@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net>
In-Reply-To: <20071031211658.GA5430@inspiron>

also sprach Alejandro Martinez Ruiz <alex@flawedcode.org> [2007.10.31.2216 +0100]:
> So how about an "undo" command or a switch for revert with a special
> meaning like "hey, this one is a nice commit, but it ain't ready yet,
> I'd like you to ignore I ever committed the thing when merging or
> rebasing again, thanks"?

Revert does exactly that, by reverting the content. That's all Git
cares about. Does

  http://lists-archives.org/git/634475-unmerging-feature-branches.html

make it clear?

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
"getting a scsi chain working is perfectly simple if you remember that
 there must be exactly three terminations: one on one end of the
 cable, one on the far end, and the goat, terminated over the scsi
 chain with a silver-handled knife whilst burning *black* candles."
                                                     -- anthony deboer
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net