Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] faster inexact rename handling
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Oct 30, 2007, 13:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20071030134627.GB21342@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vlk9lm2e5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:29:22AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> If it always gives the same results in practice, obviously > nobody can even notice. > > However, merging this series to 'pu' breaks rebase-merge test > t3402 among other things.
Yes, sorry, I meant to mention the test breakage in the cover letter (which I think is just related to the size/score normalization). This is not really meant for applying, but more for "this is taking me a lot longer than I hoped, so here is what is happening and you might be interested to comment." I'm not even sure it's pu material. :)
I will continue to refine it as I mentioned in the mail to Linus, but I am open to suggestions.
-Peff