Re: [PATCH] parse-options: Allow abbreviated options when unambiguous
- From
- Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
- Date
- Oct 14, 2007, 22:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20071014224959.GA17828@untitled>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710142309010.25221@racer.site>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 40 quoted lines
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2007, Eric Wong wrote:
>
> > Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 06:02:33PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 14 Oct 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > When there is an option "--amend", the option parser now recognizes
> > > > > "--am" for that option, provided that there is no other option beginning
> > > > > with "--am".
> > > >
> > > > And an amend for ultra-abbreviated options (as you noticed on IRC):
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/parse-options.c b/parse-options.c
> > > > index afc6c89..acabb98 100644
> > > > --- a/parse-options.c
> > > > +++ b/parse-options.c
> > > > @@ -137,6 +137,11 @@ is_abbreviated:
> > > > abbrev_flags = flags;
> > > > continue;
> > > > }
> > > > + /* negated and abbreviated very much? */
> > > > + if (!prefixcmp("no-", arg)) {
> > > > + flags |= OPT_UNSET;
> > > > + goto is_abbreviated;
> > > > + }
> > > > /* negated? */
> > > > if (strncmp(arg, "no-", 3))
> > > > continue;
> > >
> > > squashed on top on the previous, and pushed to my ph/parseopt branch.
> >
> > Awesome. Thanks to both of you.
>
> Hehe, you're welcome. Pierre even realised that my patch was not complete
> (it did not catch overly short abbreviations "--n" and "--no"), and that
> has been fixed, too.Show 8 quoted lines
> While I have your attention: last weekend, I spoke to a guy from the > ffmpeg project, and he said that the only thing preventing them from > switching to git was the lack of svn:external support... > > (Of course I know that it is more difficult than that: ffmpeg itself is an > svn:external of MPlayer, but maybe we can get both of them to switch ;-) > > Do you have any idea when/if you're coming around to add that to git-svn?
Soonish, possibly within a next week, even. I have actually have started a project (using git) that wants to use SVN-hosted repositories directly submodules; so the fact that I'll actually need something like it bodes well for getting it implemented :)
-- Eric Wong