Show 32 quoted lines
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 02:15:10PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de> writes:
> >> On Friday 21 September 2007 00:53:52 Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >>> David Brown <git@davidb.org> writes:
> >>> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:03:50PM +0200, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> >>> >>On Wednesday 19 September 2007 20:15:03 David Brown wrote:
> >>> >>> git-p4 was missing the execute bit setting if the file had other
> >>> >>> attribute bits set.
> >>> >>> ---
> >>> >>
> >>> >>I'm fine with this, so unless you find a better way:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>Acked-By: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
> >>> >
> >>> > I sent out an improved version of this patch yesterday
> >>> > <1190232768445-git-send-email-git@davidb.org> that I'd like to get
> >>> > approved. I guess I'm not quite sure what happens at this point with
> >>> > a patch.
> >>>
> >>> I still have that *768445* message as "the last one proposed as
> >>> better than previous ones" in my mbox.
> >>>
> >>> Simon?
> >>
> >> Indeed, the new improved version is much better :)
> >>
> >> Acked-By: Simon Hausmann <simon@lst.de>
> >
> >Thanks. This should go to 'maint' (part of v1.5.3.3) right?
>
> Sounds good by me. I've been using it on a few other repos, and haven't
> had any problems.