[PATCH 1/5] builtin-fetch: Don't segfault on "fetch +foo"
- From
Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Sep 18, 2007, 08:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070918085448.GA5390@spearce.org>
If we are fetching something and were configured to do a forced fetch and have no local ref to store the fetched object into we cannot mark the local ref as having a forced update. Instead we should just silently discard the + request.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> --- remote.c | 3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c index 73a34c9..af3c46b 100644 --- a/remote.c +++ b/remote.c @@ -875,8 +875,7 @@ int get_fetch_map(struct ref *remote_refs, refspec->src : "HEAD"); ref_map->peer_ref = get_local_ref(refspec->dst); - - if (refspec->force) + if (ref_map->peer_ref && refspec->force) ref_map->peer_ref->force = 1; }
-- 1.5.3.1.1000.g7319b