From: Shawn O. Pearce Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:54:48 GMT Subject: [PATCH 1/5] builtin-fetch: Don't segfault on "fetch +foo" Message-ID: <20070918085448.GA5390@spearce.org> If we are fetching something and were configured to do a forced fetch and have no local ref to store the fetched object into we cannot mark the local ref as having a forced update. Instead we should just silently discard the + request. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce --- remote.c | 3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c index 73a34c9..af3c46b 100644 --- a/remote.c +++ b/remote.c @@ -875,8 +875,7 @@ int get_fetch_map(struct ref *remote_refs, refspec->src : "HEAD"); ref_map->peer_ref = get_local_ref(refspec->dst); - - if (refspec->force) + if (ref_map->peer_ref && refspec->force) ref_map->peer_ref->force = 1; } -- 1.5.3.1.1000.g7319b